The Future Of Hydrogen
1.
Introduction
As the first law of thermodynamics states that “energy cannot be
created or destroyed; it can only be converted from one form to another”. We
have found a way to change one form of energy to another form of energy which
is beneficial for us. We have burned fossil fuels, hydropower, nuclear,
wind power, and many more which helps us to satisfy our needs. Energy has empowered
us to run our industries, households, agriculture, science, and technology. We
have reached beyond the stars with the energy revolution and still exploring how
energy can be used sustainably.
When humans started using different forms of energy there
was an inadequate amount of knowledge of how it will affect the environment, we live
in. Coal and fossil fuels were the most used source of energy to run almost
everything. Slowly we moved to more sustainable, and carbon-free sources of
energy and it has become a hot topic since then. With the energy crises
going on worldwide, everyone is looking for a solution. One of the ways
to deal with the energy crisis is to store the energy when not needed and deliver it when
needed with smart grids. For e.g. during the day, the household doesn’t require a
lot of energy, but factories are running so the smart grid would provide the required amount of energy where needed and collects the data for future
use. And when it's night-time, there is not much need for energy so the smart grid
would store it and delivers it when needed.
There are different sustainable energy sources and different
ways to store them. In this article, we
are going to talk about clean hydrogen. Since the 1800s, fuel cells and water
electrolysis has been around but never have been adopted due to a lack of
research. To meet the climate
targets hydrogen comes into play. Hydrogen is easy to produce from different
methods using various renewable energy sources. Also, it can be produced using
fossil sources with the carbon capture infrastructure. Hydrogen carries energy in the form of chemical
energy (or compressed gas energy) which later can be transferred in another
state like heat and electricity. Hydrogen is light and can be stored in
different forms over a long period which gives hydrogen the edge on
the existing energy market. It could be the alternative clean and sustainable
source of energy everyone has been looking for for some time. In the 1970s when oil
prices skyrocketed and there were petroleum shortages alongside air pollution,
hydrogen drew attention. Since then, every country has been working on hydrogen to make it better alongside many organizations that were established like the International Energy Journal of Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Collaboration
Programme in 1977. Funding is provided by the government in support of
hydrogen technology targeting different sectors to use hydrogen. Hydrogen and
electricity are similar in many cases like versatility and can be used in
different applications. They do not produce greenhouse gases, SO2,
and no ozone depletion. When used in fuel cells hydrogen only emits water. Also, hydrogen (60%) is more efficient than
gasoline (45%) and coal-fired power plant (20%).
Hydrogen
can be generated from various feedstocks including fossil resources like
natural gas and coal also with renewable sources like biomass and water using
renewable energy sources like sunlight, wind, wave, and hydropower. Various technologies like chemical, biological, electrolytic, photolytic, and
thermos-chemical which has their own benefits and challenges.
Figure 1: Methods in the production of Hydrogen
2. Production
Natural Gas
Most of today’s hydrogen is mostly produced using natural gas. There are
three methods: steam reforming (using water as an oxidant and a source of
hydrogen), partial oxidation (using oxygen in the air as the oxidant), or a
combination of both called autothermal reforming (ATR)
Electrolysis
Electrolysis is the process of separating water into hydrogen
and oxygen. Using renewable energy sources, electrolytic hydrogen could be the
option for the future. 1 kg of H2 is produced from 9 liters of water which also
produces 8 kg of oxygen as a by-product. There are three kinds of electrolysis
technology currently being used. They are alkaline electrolysis, proton
exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis, and solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs).
Water electrolysis depends upon different factors like economical and technical
factors alongside operating cost and efficiency. If renewable sources like
solar PV and wind systems could be used, then the cost would be cheaper. For
example, in Australia and Africa where there is plenty of suns could take the
price down.
Hydrogen From Coal
Coal is a well-developed energy industry used for many years
to produce ammonia from chemicals and fertilizers using gasification. On the
other hand, it produces so much CO2 which is twice as much as that natural
gas. Due to the high emission of carbon dioxide, the carbon-capture method is used for low-carbon energy.
Hydrogen from Biomass
Biomass is used to produce heat or electricity utilizing plant-based
materials like agriculture residues, wood, energy crops, etc. Also, the acids,
alcohols, and fermentation processes fall under biomass. The chemical
gasification of biomass produces CO, CO2, hydrogen, and methane. It turns out
biomass is more expensive than solar or wind or electrolysis due to operating
costs.
3.
Storage and Transport
Hydrogen faces challenges while storage since it has low volumetric
energy density. 1 kg of Hydrogen has the same amount of energy density as 2.8
kg of gasoline. In comparison to lithium batteries, it has 100 times more energy
density with the same amount of kilograms. It cannot be stored and transported like
fossil fuels and natural gas. But it can be converted into something easy to transport and store. In long-distance transmission, transportation
is more expensive than producing hydrogen itself. Pipelines are the most cost effective and long-term option for the transportation of hydrogen. Following
are the ways to store and transport hydrogen:
1.
Ammonia
2.
Synthetic hydrocarbons
a.
Synthetic methane
b.
Synthetic diesel or kerosene
c.
Synthetic Methanol
Figure 2: Transmission, distribution, and storage
elements of hydrogen value chains
Hydrogen can be stored as gas or liquid in tanks for small-scale applications. Also, geological storage could be used for large-scale and
long-term storage. During the 1970s and
1980s salt caverns were used in USA and UK to store hydrogen. Depleted oil
reservoirs could be used which are bigger in size than salt caverns.
4.
Cost
The cost varies from process to process as shown below in the
table.
Process |
Energy source |
Feedstock |
Capital cost (M$) |
Hydrogen cost ($/kg) |
SMR with CCS |
Standard fossil fuels |
Natural gas |
226.4 |
2.27 |
SMR without CCS |
Standard fossil fuels |
Natural gas |
180.7 |
2.08 |
CC with CCS |
Standard fossil fuels |
Coal |
545.6 |
1.63 |
CG without CCS |
Standard fossil fuels |
Coal |
435.9 |
1.34 |
ATR of methane with CCS |
Standard fossil fuels |
Natural gas |
183.8 |
1.48 |
Methane pyrolysis |
Internally generated steam |
Natural gas |
– |
1.59–1.70 |
Biomass pyrolysis |
Internally generated steam |
Woody biomass |
53.4–3.1 |
1.25–2.20 |
Biomass gasification |
Internally generated steam |
Woody biomass |
149.3–6.4 |
1.77–2.05 |
Direct bio-photolysis |
Solar |
Water + algae |
50 $/m2 |
2.13 |
Indirect bio-photolysis |
Solar |
Water + algae |
135 $/m2 |
1.42 |
Dark fermentation |
– |
Organic biomass |
– |
2.57 |
Photo-fermentation |
Solar |
Organic biomass |
– |
2.83 |
Solar PV electrolysis |
Solar |
Water |
12–54.5 |
5.78–23.27 |
Solar thermal electrolysis |
Solar |
Water |
421–22.1 |
5.10–10.49 |
Wind electrolysis |
Wind |
Water |
504.8–499.6 |
5.89–6.03 |
Nuclear electrolysis |
Nuclear |
Water |
– |
4.15–7.00 |
Nuclear thermolysis |
Nuclear |
Water |
39.6–2107.6 |
2.17–2.63 |
Solar thermolysis |
Solar |
Water |
5.7–16 |
7.98–8.40 |
Photo-electrolysis |
Solar |
Water |
– |
10.36 |
Figure 3: Production Methods Comparison
While we are talking about production, we also need to take into consideration the storage of the energy produced.
If we compare Li-ion battery storage with hydrogen storage with a max power rating
of 100MW results will be as follows:
|
Power Rating |
Discharge time |
Cycles |
Watt-hour/l |
Efficiency |
Li-ion |
100 |
1min-8 hrs |
1000-10,0000 |
200-400 |
85-95 % |
Hydrogen |
100 |
Weeks |
5-30 years |
600 |
25-45 % |
So, if we want to store the energy
for the long run hydrogen is the option with a high cycle.
Hydrogen efficiency is less because the energy is lost in production and transportation.
If only hydrogen is used on the site of production,
it could take efficiency to 75-85%. Whereas lithium-ion batteries lost only 15%
of energy in transportation and from charging and discharging combined. When
stored and used later around 5-10% of energy is lost in Li-ion while moving the vehicle.
But if we compare energy density
then, hydrogen has 3500 watts per kilogram whereas li-ion batteries have 200
watts per kilogram which is almost 100 times less.
Figure 4: Battery cost over the years
As shown above we have come a long
in battery development and cost over the years. It is almost 10 times cheaper in
2023 than in 2011. Now green hydrogen costs around 2.50$- 6.80$ whereas
cheap hydrogen would be between 1$ - 1.80$ which is high carbon-hydrogen.
5. Colors of Hydrogen
• Grey hydrogen is the most common
form and is generated from natural gas, or methane, through a process called
“steam reforming”.
• Hydrogen is labeled blue whenever
the carbon generated from steam reforming is captured and stored underground
through industrial carbon capture and storage (CCS). Blue hydrogen is,
therefore, sometimes referred to as carbon neutral as the emissions are not
dispersed in the atmosphere. However, some argue that “low carbon” would be a
more accurate description, as 10-20% of the generated carbon cannot be
captured.
• Turquoise hydrogen refers to a way
of creating hydrogen through a process called methane pyrolysis, which
generates solid carbon.
• Green hydrogen – also referred to as
“clean hydrogen” – is produced by using clean energy from surplus renewable
energy sources, such as solar or wind power, to split water into two hydrogen
atoms and one oxygen atom through a process called electrolysis.
• Pink hydrogen is created
through electrolysis of water but the latter is powered by nuclear energy
rather than renewables.
6.
Conclusion
Hydrogen is a quite promising technology with plenty of
research going on. Several countries are already testing the use of hydrogen. The USA already has a pipeline of 750 miles to transport hydrogen. In 2020, the EU
has launched 100 billion euros to European Green Acceleration Center to develop
a green hydrogen economy by 2025 which would bring the cost of hydrogen to 2$
per kilogram which means 50$ per megawatt. In countries like Japan 7 thousand of fuel cell vehicles were in use as of 2022. The USA has planned to invest 7 billion
dollars to develop hydrogen production to meet the need by 2030 which is 10
billion tonnes.
Hydrogen is already widely used in some industries and is yet to
realize the full potential of this suitable and clean energy. Promoting and
investing in R&D is necessary for the government to scale up hydrogen
supply and demand.
Right now, the government has a key role to play in the
advancement of hydrogen technology with challenges like cost, uncertain
technology, supply and demand, and infrastructure with public acceptance. The next
step would be Integration, Development, coordination, and Creation.
Comments
Post a Comment